Employee Engagement & Listening
Don’t just survey your people. Listen continuously.
One annual survey tells you how people felt in the week you asked. Prosper listens across the whole employee journey — onboarding, ninety days, every quarter and exit — reaching the people who have never had a company email address.
Trusted by organisations with frontline, operational and desk-based teams
The problem
The annual engagement survey is not employee listening
Most organisations survey once a year, report the number to the board, and change very little as a result. The survey becomes a measurement exercise rather than a listening system — and employees notice the difference within one cycle.
Three things break in that model. Timing: twelve months is long enough for a site to deteriorate completely before anyone sees it in the data. Reach: email surveys sent to workers who have never had a company email address routinely return under 20% response, so the results describe the office and get presented as the organisation. Action: results arrive weeks after close, by which point the moment to respond has passed.
The organisations that actually move the number treat engagement as an output rather than a target. They listen at the moments that matter, they read the comments as well as the scores, and they close the loop visibly enough that people answer honestly next time.
The model
Listen. Understand. Act. Measure.
Employee listening is a loop, not a project. The value is not in collecting the data — it is in knowing what to do next, and finding out whether it worked.
Listen
Engagement surveys, pulse checks, lifecycle surveys and eNPS — delivered by email, SMS or push notification so everyone can respond.
Understand
Scores tell you what. Comments tell you why. AI analysis themes thousands of responses in hours rather than weeks.
Act
Results segmented by site, team, role and tenure, so action happens where the problem is rather than organisation-wide.
Measure
Pulse the specific issue six weeks later. Find out whether the action worked instead of waiting a year to guess.
The full method is covered in our employee engagement guides.
Capabilities
A listening system, not a survey tool
Seven capabilities that work together across the employee journey.
Engagement surveys
Measure what actually drives engagement
A comprehensive engagement survey covering the drivers that determine whether people stay and how hard they work. Questions are grouped by driver, so results tell you which specific area needs attention rather than producing one number with no diagnosis.
- Full engagement surveys, quarterly or biannual
- eNPS as a single headline metric
- Custom questions alongside the standard set
- Results segmented by site, team, role and tenure
- Trend tracking across every cycle
Lifecycle surveys
Listen at the moments that decide retention
The most useful feedback rarely arrives during the annual survey. It arrives at day 30 when the role turns out to be different from the interview, or at exit when someone finally says what has been wrong for months. Lifecycle surveys trigger automatically at each of those moments.
- New starter, 30, 60 and 90-day surveys
- Probation and anniversary check-ins
- Role change and internal move surveys
- Exit surveys for every departure
- Triggered by tenure — nobody schedules them
Multi-channel delivery
Reach people who have never had a work email
Email works for the support office. It does not work for a childcare educator, a bartender or a warehouse operator. Prosper delivers surveys by email, SMS or push notification to a personal phone, so participation is not limited by whether someone sits at a desk.
- Push notification to the Prosper mobile app
- SMS for teams without app access
- Email where it is genuinely the best channel
- No company email address required
- Automated reminders to non-responders
Automated workflows
Set it once, then leave it running
The reason continuous listening usually fails is that somebody has to remember to launch each survey. Prosper connects to your HRIS, picks up new starters automatically, and triggers the right survey at the right point in someone’s tenure without anyone scheduling it.
- New employees sync from your HRIS
- Surveys trigger on tenure milestones
- Reminders sent automatically to non-responders
- Recurring pulse schedules
- Results captured and reported without manual collation
Comments & verbatim feedback
Scores tell you what. Comments tell you why.
An engagement score of 72 tells you something is broadly working and something is not. It does not tell you that three sites have a rostering problem or that a specific manager is the reason people are leaving. The comments do. AI analysis themes thousands of them in hours rather than weeks of manual reading.
- Open-text questions alongside every survey
- AI theming across all comments
- Sentiment identified per theme
- Comments segmented by site and team
- Confidential reporting with minimum thresholds
Reporting & analytics
A decision-making system, not a dashboard
An organisation-wide engagement score is nearly useless on its own. The value is in the variance — which sites are strong, which are fragile, which roles feel unsupported, and whether new starters feel differently from people at three years. Every result segments by site, team, role, tenure and employment type.
- Engagement, eNPS and response rate at a glance
- Heatmaps by site, team and driver
- Trend and historical comparison
- Question-level analysis
- Lifecycle stage comparison
- Export for board and leadership packs
Manager reporting
Engagement stops being an HR problem
Engagement is produced by managers in daily practice, not by HR in a survey cycle. When each manager can see their own team’s results, their strengths, their gaps and the comments relevant to them, engagement becomes something they own rather than something they are reported on.
- Managers see their own team results
- Strengths and opportunities identified
- Team comments, confidentially thresholded
- Comparison against organisation average
- Action prompts based on the weakest driver
Lifecycle listening
Listen across the whole journey, not once a year
Different questions matter at different moments. Each of these triggers automatically based on tenure — nobody schedules them.
See how this plays out for one employee in the employee experience journey.
From data to decision
The insights lifecycle listening produces
Comparing sentiment across stages surfaces things a single annual survey structurally cannot.
“New starters love the company but struggle in their first thirty days.”
Day 1 sentiment is high and day 30 drops sharply. The employer brand is working and onboarding is not — which is a fixable problem, and an expensive one to leave alone given most frontline turnover happens inside ninety days.
“Engagement falls off after about six months.”
The honeymoon ends and nothing replaces it. Usually this is a development problem — people who cannot see what comes next start looking for it elsewhere, and six months is roughly when that begins.
“Exit comments keep naming the same manager.”
One departure is an event. Five departures citing the same site and the same theme is a pattern — and it is invisible unless you survey every exit and read them together.
“Two sites, same procedures, twenty-point engagement gap.”
The difference is almost never the procedures. Segmenting by site turns an unhelpful organisation-wide average into a specific conversation with a specific manager.
Frontline listening
Your people should not need a desk to have a voice
Most employee survey platforms were built for knowledge workers. That assumption quietly excludes the majority of an Australian frontline workforce.
Email assumes an inbox. Survey links assume a browser session. Fifteen-minute questionnaires assume uninterrupted time. None of that describes a childcare educator between rooms, a bartender on a Friday, or a warehouse operator on a rotating roster.
The practical consequence is a measurement gap. An email survey reaches the support office and misses the sites, producing data that describes a minority and gets presented to the board as the whole organisation. Low frontline response is almost never a motivation problem. It is a distribution problem.
Push notification
Straight to the phone already in their pocket, through the app they use for news and recognition. The highest-response channel for teams with the app rolled out.
SMS
For sites where the app is not yet rolled out, or workforces that prefer text. No app download, no login, no company email address.
Still the right channel for the support office and anyone who genuinely works at a desk. Use it where it fits rather than by default.
More on this in our guide to frontline engagement surveys.
Compare
Prosper against the alternatives
An honest comparison of the four approaches Australian organisations are usually choosing between.
| Prosper | Annual survey only | Generic survey tool | Spreadsheets / forms | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engagement surveys | Yes | Yes | Yes | Manual build |
| Lifecycle surveys | Automated by tenure | No | Manual setup | No |
| Onboarding & exit surveys | Triggered automatically | Rarely | Manual each time | Manual each time |
| SMS delivery | Yes | — | Sometimes, at extra cost | No |
| Push notification | Yes, via the employee app | — | Rarely | No |
| Works without company email | Yes | — | Usually not | No |
| Automated reminders | Yes | Manual | Varies | Manual |
| HRIS integration | foundU, Employment Hero, Tanda, ADP | — | Varies | No |
| Verbatim comment analysis | AI theming and sentiment | Manual reading | Usually manual | Manual |
| Segmentation by site and tenure | Standard | If configured | Varies | Manual pivot tables |
| Manager-level reporting | Every manager sees their team | HR only | Often HR only | HR only |
| Trend across cycles | Automatic | Year on year only | Varies | Manual |
| Connects to performance & recognition | Same platform | No | No | No |
| Ongoing admin effort | Minimal after setup | Weeks per cycle | Moderate | Weeks per cycle |
Who it is for
What changes, depending on where you sit
HR & People Leaders
Running the survey is not the hard part — getting response rates above 50% from frontline sites and turning results into something the executive team will act on is. Prosper automates the cycle and segments the results so the conversation is about a specific site rather than an organisation-wide average.
Frontline Managers
Most managers are reported on for engagement and never given the data. In Prosper each manager sees their own team’s results, their weakest driver and the comments relevant to them — which turns engagement from an HR metric into something they can act on.
Executives
You need to know which locations are fragile before the resignations start, and you need something more defensible than intuition for the board. Segmented trend data and lifecycle comparison give you both.
Operations Leaders
Engagement and turnover correlate tightly with operational performance, and both vary enormously between sites with identical procedures. Site-level data tells you which venues need attention and which managers are worth learning from.
Employees
A two-minute survey on your own phone, at a time that suits, with visible evidence that last time’s feedback changed something. That last part is what determines whether anyone bothers next cycle.
Business Owners
Turnover is one of the largest controllable costs in a frontline business. Listening early is materially cheaper than replacing people, and the data shows you where the cost is concentrated.
By industry
Built for the industries most survey tools ignore
Childcare & Early Education
Educator turnover is the defining sector challenge and NQF obligations make documentation matter. Day 30 and day 90 surveys catch the gap between what the role was described as and what it turns out to be — which is where most early departures originate.
Hospitality
Casual-heavy, multi-venue and rostered tightly. Push and SMS delivery gets response rates that email never will, and site-level segmentation shows which venue has a rostering problem rather than averaging it away.
Retail
Seasonal intakes create waves of new starters who all hit day 30 at once. Automated lifecycle surveys handle that without anyone scheduling a thing, and store-level comparison shows which managers retain their casuals.
Healthcare & Aged Care
A workforce under sustained pressure where wellbeing questions need handling carefully and confidentially. Pulse checks surface strain early enough to respond, and exit surveys identify whether departures are about the work or the management.
NDIS & Community Services
Distributed teams, lone workers and participants at the centre of everything. Reaching support workers who are rarely at an office requires SMS and push rather than email, and connection scores are worth watching closely.
Manufacturing & Logistics
Shift patterns mean any survey requiring a desk session will miss most of the workforce. Two-minute pulses on a phone between shifts get answered; fifteen-minute questionnaires do not.
Franchises & Multi-site
Consistency is the whole problem. Comparable data across every location shows which franchisees are investing in their people and which are running a revolving door.
Field Services
Teams who are never in the same place twice. Push notification is the only channel that reliably reaches them, and lifecycle triggers mean nobody has to remember who joined when.
Fair questions
Objections worth raising
The things HR leaders actually say when we show them this, answered honestly.
We already run an annual survey.
Then you already have the hardest part — executive buy-in for listening. The gap is what happens in the other eleven months. Adding lifecycle triggers and monthly pulses to an existing annual survey usually costs less effort than the annual survey itself, because the cycle runs automatically.
Our response rates are already good.
If they are above 70% across every site including the frontline, they genuinely are. Worth checking the split though — a healthy overall number often hides an office at 85% and sites at 30%, which means the results describe a minority.
Our frontline employees do not use email.
That is precisely the problem Prosper was built around. Surveys go by push notification or SMS to a personal phone. No company email address, no app requirement for SMS, no desktop.
Managers will not act on the results.
Usually because they never see them. Most platforms report to HR and leave managers to be told about their score afterwards. In Prosper each manager sees their own team’s results, weakest driver and comments — which is the difference between being measured and being able to act.
We already use Culture Amp.
Culture Amp is a strong platform with excellent survey design and benchmarking, built primarily for desk-based workforces. If most of your people sit at a desk, it will serve you well. If most of them work shifts without a company email address, the constraint worth testing is reach — compare response rates by site rather than the overall number.
We use Microsoft Forms and it is free.
It is, and for a one-off question to the office it is fine. What it does not do is trigger by tenure, deliver by SMS, theme comments, segment by site and tenure, report to managers, or track trend across cycles. The cost shows up as HR time rather than licence fees.
Is this not just another survey tool?
A survey tool collects responses. The distinction that matters is what happens afterwards — whether the cycle runs itself, whether the comments get analysed, whether managers see their own data, and whether you can tell six weeks later if the action worked.
We do not have time to manage another system.
Reasonable, and worth testing directly. Ask how many hours your current cycle consumes in scheduling, chasing, collating and reporting. Automation is the point of the product, not a feature of it.
Trust
Honest feedback depends on employees trusting the process
People answer honestly when they believe two things: that their individual response cannot be identified, and that the organisation will do something with it. The first is a configuration question. The second is a leadership one, and no platform can solve it for you.
Confidential by design
Responses are de-identified in reporting but linked to demographics such as site and tenure, so analysis is possible without exposing individuals. Minimum reporting thresholds prevent small teams from being identifiable.
Australian data hosting
Data is hosted in Australian data centres with encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access control, and support for single sign-on and multi-factor authentication. Detail on our security page.
Close the loop
The single strongest driver of next cycle’s response rate is whether people saw anything change after the last one. Share results openly, including the uncomfortable ones, and name what you are going to do.
Integrations
Connects to what you already run
Payroll & HRIS
foundU, Employment Hero, Tanda, ADP and others. New starters flow through with role, team and location attached — which is what makes tenure-triggered surveys possible without anyone maintaining a list.
Identity & calendar
Single sign-on for desk-based staff, with Outlook and Google Calendar for scheduling the conversations that follow survey results.
The rest of Prosper
Engagement data sits alongside performance, recognition and communication, so you can see whether sites with strong recognition also retain people. Full list on our integrations page.
Go deeper
Resources on employee engagement
FAQs
Employee engagement and listening, answered
Employee engagement software helps organisations measure, understand and improve how connected and committed their employees feel. It typically includes engagement surveys, pulse surveys, eNPS, comment analysis and reporting segmented by team, site and tenure.
A structured questionnaire measuring how employees feel across the drivers that shape their experience — manager effectiveness, role clarity, recognition, development, communication, wellbeing and organisational alignment. Comprehensive surveys typically run 30 to 40 questions and take under five minutes.
Employee listening is the ongoing practice of gathering employee feedback across the whole employment journey rather than at a single annual moment. It combines engagement surveys, pulse checks, lifecycle surveys at key milestones, and open-text comments — with the expectation that the organisation acts on what it hears.
Employee experience is the input — every interaction someone has with the organisation. Employee engagement is the outcome that experience produces. You cannot improve engagement directly; you improve the experience and measure whether the score moved.
A comprehensive survey quarterly or biannually, with monthly pulse checks in between and lifecycle surveys triggered at onboarding, anniversary and exit. Never survey more often than you can genuinely act on the results.
A survey triggered at a specific point in someone's employment rather than on an organisational calendar — new starter, day 30, day 60, day 90, probation, anniversary, role change or exit. Lifecycle surveys capture feedback at the moments that most shape whether someone stays.
Because the most useful feedback rarely arrives during the annual cycle. It arrives at day 30 when the role turns out to differ from the interview, or at exit when someone finally explains what has been wrong for months. In a workforce turning over 30% a year, an annual survey never reaches a substantial share of employees at all.
Whether the role matches what was described at interview, whether they know who to ask when unsure, how their first week went, what took longest to work out, and whether anything they were told during recruitment has not turned out to be the case. That last question is uncomfortable and the most useful.
Why they are leaving in their own words, what would have made them stay, how they found their manager, whether they had a clear path forward, and whether they would consider returning. Then review the answers quarterly for patterns by site and manager rather than reading them one at a time.
Through a comprehensive survey covering the recognised drivers, segmented by site, team, role and tenure, supported by monthly pulse checks and eNPS as a headline metric. The variance between your strongest and weakest area is more actionable than the overall average.
Employee Net Promoter Score measures how likely employees are to recommend their organisation as a place to work, on a 0 to 10 scale. It is calculated by subtracting the percentage of detractors (0 to 6) from the percentage of promoters (9 to 10), producing a score between minus 100 and plus 100.
Above 70% favourable is generally considered strong, though benchmarks vary considerably by industry. The trend across cycles and the gap between your best and worst site usually matter more than the headline number.
Above 70% is strong and above 80% excellent. Below 50%, the results may not represent your workforce — and it is worth checking the split by site, because a healthy overall figure often hides an office at 85% and frontline sites at 30%.
For frontline teams the single biggest lever is delivery channel. Email surveys to workers without company email addresses routinely return under 20%; the same survey by push notification regularly exceeds 70%. After that: keep it under five minutes, send automated reminders, and visibly act on the previous round.
Deliver by push notification to a mobile app or by SMS to a personal phone, keep the survey short enough to complete between tasks, and do not require a company email address or desktop access. Low frontline response is a distribution problem, not a motivation problem.
Yes. Prosper can deliver surveys by SMS, which is particularly useful for sites where the mobile app has not been rolled out or for workforces who prefer text. No app download or company email address is needed.
Yes. Surveys are delivered by push notification through the Prosper mobile app, which is typically the highest-response channel for teams who already use the app for company news, documents and recognition.
Connect your HRIS so employee data syncs automatically, then set rules that trigger surveys at tenure milestones — day 30, day 90, anniversary, exit. Reminders to non-responders send automatically, results are captured without manual collation, and nobody has to remember to launch anything.
An approach where feedback is gathered continuously across the employee journey rather than in a single annual event — combining comprehensive surveys, monthly pulses, lifecycle triggers and open comments, with action taken between cycles rather than after them.
By identifying which sites, teams and tenure groups are at risk early enough to intervene. A quarterly cycle with monthly pulses surfaces a deteriorating location within weeks; an annual cycle finds out twelve months later, usually after the resignations.
At scale, manual reading is impractical — five hundred employees producing a paragraph each takes weeks. AI comment analysis groups responses into themes, identifies sentiment per theme, and surfaces what is most frequently raised, in hours rather than weeks.
Scores tell you what is happening. An engagement score of 72 says something is broadly working and something is not. Comments tell you why — that three sites have a rostering problem, or that a specific manager is the reason people are leaving. You cannot act on a number alone.
Share results openly including the uncomfortable findings, pick a small number of specific actions rather than a long plan, push ownership to site level where the problem actually sits, tell people what changed and that it came from their feedback, then pulse the same issue six weeks later to see whether it worked.
Manager effectiveness is consistently the strongest, followed by role clarity, recognition, development opportunity, communication, and whether employees believe their feedback leads to action. Pay appears in the list but rarely at the top.
Most engagement surveys use confidential rather than anonymous design — responses are de-identified but linked to demographics such as site and tenure so analysis is possible. Minimum reporting thresholds prevent small teams from being identifiable.
Yes. In Prosper each manager sees their team's engagement, strongest and weakest drivers, and the comments relevant to them, subject to minimum reporting thresholds. This is what turns engagement from something managers are reported on into something they can act on.
A short questionnaire of five to ten questions run monthly or fortnightly to track movement between comprehensive surveys. It answers whether anything is changing, while the full survey diagnoses why.
Most organisations run their first survey within two weeks. If employee data syncs from a payroll platform such as foundU, Employment Hero or Tanda, setup is faster because the employee list populates automatically.
Yes — foundU, Employment Hero, Tanda, ADP and others. Employee data syncs with role, team and location attached, which is what allows lifecycle surveys to trigger automatically by tenure. See our integrations page for the current list.
A survey tool collects responses. Prosper triggers surveys automatically by tenure, delivers by SMS and push as well as email, themes comments with AI, segments results by site and tenure, reports to individual managers, and connects engagement data to performance and recognition on the same platform.
Yes. Many organisations start with surveys or communication and add performance, recognition and onboarding later. Starting with one or two capabilities and expanding as adoption grows produces better results than switching everything on at once.
Pricing varies by capability and organisation size, typically between $4 and $15 per employee per month. Taking engagement as part of a wider platform is usually more economical than separate point solutions. Book a consultation for a quote based on your workforce.
Get started
Find out what your people would tell you
Book a 30-minute consultation and we will show you employee listening configured for your industry and your sites — including how surveys reach the people who have never had a company email address.